Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QUESTION\s+\"OMNI\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QUESTION\s+\"OMNI\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] QUESTION "OMNI" (score: 1): Author: k3ivb@stargate.net (Curt); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:03:09 -0500; Has anyone out there tried a side by side comparison of the Omni-VI Plus and the IC756PRO? Also since TenTec failes to mention an auto-antenna tuner in the Omni, I take it it does not come with one?; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00130.html (6,980 bytes)
2. [TenTec] QUESTION "OMNI" (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:59:52 -0800 (PST); Hi Curt - No auto tuner for the OMNI VI Plus. The explanation is that the OMNI VI will go ahead and put power into a load with up to a 3:1 SWR, where the Icom cuts its power back, therefore needs an; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00131.html (7,660 bytes)
3. [TenTec] QUESTION "OMNI" (score: 1): Author: mauro@idt.net (Bob Mauro - PeopleNet); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:35:12 -0500 (EST); i did hear a few guys say they liked the Omni 6+ better than the IC 756 Pro. they were from this reflector. but forget who they were. Bob Mauro, Mauro@Idt.Net Amateur Radio Station KZ2G -- Vistit My; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00135.html (8,656 bytes)
4. [TenTec] QUESTION "OMNI" (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 18:13:24 -0800; My experience with the built-in tuner in a couple of different radios concluded that the range the tuner will handle is very limited. I've found that an external tuner works better. I run high power; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00136.html (8,413 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]