Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+R\-7000\s+Vertical\s+Experience\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: K5XS@aol.com (K5XS@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:47:49 -0400 (EDT)
I apologize for being a tad off topic here, but after reading the QST review I wondered what my Ten-Tec brothers and sisters would have to say. Has anyone used the R-7000 vertical? I'm generally not
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00099.html (8,237 bytes)

2. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: Philippe.Nouchi@cern.ch (Philippe NOUCHI)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 10:36:12 +0200
I use one for one year and half, I burned the 20m and 30m traps with only an IC2KL (400W and the SWR < 2:1). Same problem with the R7000 at the club station F5KPG but only the 20m trap burned (Yes bu
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00100.html (9,402 bytes)

3. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: nwald@interaccess.com (Norman Wald)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 07:47:26 -0500
To: <tentec@contesting.com> Norman Wald 2125 W. Summerdale Ave. Chicago, IL 60625 nwald@interaccess.com Amateur Radio N9NW (312) 490-6622 voice pager (773) 878-8863 fax -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00102.html (11,161 bytes)

4. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: owen@piper.eeel.nist.gov (James C. Owen, III)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 09:09:17 -0500 (EST)
Hi Bernie, Wouldn't the R-7000 be a little large for portable use? I think that it requires a lot of construction to set up. Maybe more than you want to do in the field. The best bet in my book is tw
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00105.html (9,767 bytes)

5. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: Reid_W_Simmons@ccm2.hf.intel.com (Reid W Simmons)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 97 08:24:00 PDT
Text item: Bernie; I am not sure how well the R-7000 correlates with the R-7, but I used an R-7 with my Omni VI for many years with no problems. The SWR/bandwidth curves that I plotted for my particu
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00106.html (12,024 bytes)

6. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: dwright@microagesf.com (David Wright)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 10:49:37 -0700
I concur. I've used both the R-7 & R-7000. Both are overrated on their power handling capabilities. I've burned traps on both antennas with a 500w AL-80B. On the R-7, the "black box" on the bottom of
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00108.html (12,085 bytes)

7. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: n4Lq@igLou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 13:22:23 -0700
Not a bit off topic. The R-7000 will work great with TenTec rigs since they are more forgiving of high SWRs than the competitors. As for portability, forget it! What are you going to do about all tho
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00109.html (8,483 bytes)

8. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: k8mn@clinet.fi (Dave Heil)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:42:23 +0100
Gentlemen, In responding to K5XS's query regarding the off-topic vertical discussion, let's be careful not to let our opinions get in the way of facts. I used an R-5 vertical as my only 12 and 17 Mtr
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00112.html (11,309 bytes)

9. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: larrygibbs_@ibm.net (Larry Gibbs)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 18:45:52 -0400
Bernie, Use some sort of dipole, either cut to band for with or without a tuner (with would be better, since physical condx. will vary) or an open wire fed length or wire as was suggested by another.
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00117.html (9,080 bytes)

10. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:08:24 -0700
.... Lots of lively discussion on this one! I have to agree strongly with Larry. Our University of Calif, Irvine ham club has an R-7000 and it is NOT a simple portable antenna. It is not light, not e
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00118.html (9,967 bytes)

11. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton)
Date: 16 Oct 1997 14:47 EDT
Well here it is from the horse's mouth. I was one of the two stations that were involved with the on-the-air R7000 testing. The article presents the R7000 in a pretty good light. It seemed to be wor
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00122.html (10,102 bytes)

12. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: cyee@bidmc.harvard.edu (Conway Yee)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 15:27:16 EDT
In a thread on the tentec reflector about the R-7000: There in lies the problem I have with the objectivity of QST reviews. (Although I have found no other magazine for any other type of gear any bet
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00123.html (10,248 bytes)

13. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre)
Date: 16 Oct 1997 15:08:24 -0500
Testing a dipole against a vertical at less than the other side of a continent is testing apples vs. oranges. There are a lot of variables in far field or skip testing. Modeling might be the better t
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00124.html (11,955 bytes)

14. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: bames@mecasw.com (bames@mecasw.com)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 16:45:22 -0400
Gee, if I were a big buck$ advertiser I would make sure that my contract specifically prohibited ANY negative content about my products. And for those who don't advertise, I expect the publication do
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00126.html (8,600 bytes)

15. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: steve@austin.ibm.com (Steve Runyon)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 17:11:49 -0500 (CDT)
Gee, if I was a publisher, I wouldn't accept any advertisers who required a contract that limited what I could say about their product in ... say, my product reviews. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00127.html (8,540 bytes)

16. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: larrygibbs_@ibm.net (Larry Gibbs)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 20:05:46 -0400
Conway, QST has done many negative reviews over the years. Sometimes, however, the negatives only apply to certain aspects of the equipment. A few months ago I ruled out ALL HF mobile rigs with detac
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00128.html (11,514 bytes)

17. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A. Calvin)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 21:14:40 -0400
This discussion is getting a bit silly. Verticals over a good ground plane will outperform most dipoles as hams use them today with little effort - for DXing. If you want a good antenna for talking a
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00130.html (10,176 bytes)

18. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: bames@mecasw.com (bames@mecasw.com)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 08:59:12 -0400
Gee, no advertising, no publication, no reviews. Perhaps no reviews is good reviews! ;-) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requ
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00140.html (8,328 bytes)

19. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 12:30:42 -0400
Yes, I've had one for about a year. Hmm. I wouldn't recommend trying to hike out in the boonies with one. It is fairly bulky. If you could pull it off a truck and put it up, that would be OK. Also, a
/archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00195.html (9,018 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu