Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RADIO\s+COMPARISONS\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: Lee <ny6p01@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:52:30 -0700
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00840.html (10,157 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: art N4UC <n4uc@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:05:52 -0500
I agree with your last two statements Ed, and I'd be right there with you. But based on all the comments I've seen here about where Ten Tec is and where it's going, I don't think it's gonna happen, f
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00841.html (17,931 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:02:55 -0500
*I am Not an Engineer. Never have claimed to be. Recently my friend with newly minted General Class in hand, ask me to come over and help him setup his station. The antenna went up just fine and all
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00845.html (13,445 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:20:40 -0400
My own thoughts are that it is a VERY bad decision for a new ham to start with a 200 watt mega-rig from the get-go....Ten Tec OR ricebox! ....Dave On 7/28/14, 3:02 PM, Wade Staggs wrote: *I am Not an
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00846.html (14,348 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:51:22 +0200
I find the Jupiter to be a wonderful starter radio. Once you've mastered the bare radio, you can add N4PY software and learn that end of the hobby. When you're comfortable with all of that, then you
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00849.html (15,142 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:08:42 -0400
based on all the comments I've seen here about where Ten Tec is and where it's going, _______________________________________________ Now there is a reliable basis for prediction! Nearly all comments
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00853.html (11,025 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:34:50 -0700
If the button count is correct, then that's certainly a TS-990. I'm not knocking it - I like lots of buttons, switches, knobs and other controls. However, as nice as it is that your friend with his n
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00855.html (9,789 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:48:04 -0400
There is no reason a new operator should start with a simple, less capable rig. Why hobble him early on. The default settings on any rig will serve well, while he learns to use its more esoteric feat
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00862.html (10,065 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:54:48 -0400
At 11:48 PM 7/28/2014, K8JHR wrote: There is no reason a new operator should start with a simple, less capable rig. Why hobble him early on. The default settings on any rig will serve well, while he
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00863.html (11,003 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] RADIO COMPARISONS (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:58:38 -0400
Ah ha! You win, and I Uncle! ;-) -- JHR -- Au contraire, JR: Learning to copy through QRM due to barn-door selectivity did wonders for developing mental selectivity that aided contesting endeavors tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00864.html (9,734 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu