Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+Delta\s+I\s+vs\s+Delta\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+Delta\s+I\s+vs\s+Delta\s+II\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: "radiobrad" <radiobrad@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:15:49 -0400; Delta II / Argonaut II specs Both radios will operate on 60m and MARS. It is only two button operation to go from ham / general coverage transmit. 73 Brad WA4MAE _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00899.html (6,486 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:51 -0400; Argonaut II ? TenTec 515? Don't believe so. I have one sitting here on my desk, and it doesn't cover 60m. At 02:15 AM 7/28/2004, you wrote: Delta II / Argonaut II specs Both radios will operate on 60; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00900.html (7,255 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: Bob Stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:16:29 -0400; I think the Argonaut II is the 535, TT tends to number rigs a bit funny <g> 73, Bob KB1CIW? At 04:26 PM 7/28/2004 -0400, Charles Greene wrote: Argonaut II ? TenTec 515? Don't believe so. I have one s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00901.html (7,974 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:24:46 -0400; I don't recall offhand what number the Argonaut II was but it wasn't the 515. That was the number for the third incarnation of the original Argonaut 505 (with the 509). Sure wish now I'd picked one u; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00902.html (8,515 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:01:40 -0400; Bob and all, You are correct. I thought the 515 was the Argonaut II, but upon checking Rich Arland's Low Power Communication, I see the 535 is similar to the Delta II, without the 100 watt deck. I ap; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00907.html (8,073 bytes)
6. [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1): Author: "radiobrad" <radiobrad@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:36:34 -0400; Delta II / MOD 536 & ARGONAUT II / MOD 535 The 536 has 100 watt pa, the 535 has only 5 watts Basic specs same for both Both will do 60m ( 1.8mhz to 29.999.99 mhz TX range) RX 100khz to 29.99.99 mhz N; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00952.html (7,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]