Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+More\s+About\s+Clix\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3))
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:59:55 -0700
I posted a reply about measuring "microchirp" yesterday but it never made it to the list. Here's my second try: -- In fact, you can. You need an instrument that can capture a signal without missing a
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00002.html (8,552 bytes)

2. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:09:30 -0500
The operative word here is "reasonable." Al, I don't disagree with your statement in the least, but for most of us, securing a vector signal analyzer simply isn't an option for our measurements. -Pau
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00005.html (9,479 bytes)

3. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3))
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:02:52 -0700
Paul-- Man, you are absolutely right. I really just wanted people to know that you can measure just about anything given the right test equipment. I don't really appreciate it enough, but one of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00011.html (11,189 bytes)

4. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:20:59 -0500
Send one up here to Ky. I found a preowned one for $39,000 but would rather keep the house. Can a sound card keep up with this? Could one of the audio analyzer programs display the frequency change o
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00013.html (12,718 bytes)

5. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:24:06 -0500
The operative word here is "reasonable." Al, I don't disagree with your statement in the least, but for most of us, securing a vector signal analyzer simply isn't an option for our measurements. -Pau
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00014.html (9,521 bytes)

6. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 15:27:19 -0500
In theory, I believe that some of the sound card analysis programs can work, but I'm not sure if they sample fast enough to detect the change in pitch...although we're probably speaking of less than
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00029.html (14,796 bytes)

7. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 19:47:20 -0600
Paul, I use MixW for most digital modes and SpectroGram for general spectral estimation. I have found that I can readily see a 10 Hz change in frequency on the waterfall under steady state conditions
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00031.html (9,629 bytes)

8. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 06:46:42 -0500
Nice work George. It appears that the 10 Hz change is indeed detectable with the waterfall display. Now, we just need to apply it to a strong signal with microchirp. Looks like the resolution with Mi
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00048.html (13,821 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu