- 1. [TenTec] RE: Paragon II (score: 1)
- Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@direcway.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:55:52 -0500
- In addition, the Paragon II has a better computer controlled command set, FM standard, and fewer birdies. I am glad I made the additional investment. I really like mine. Ed, N5EI ____________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00685.html (6,600 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Re: Paragon II (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:20:09 -1000
- Hi all, I have recently purchased a Paragon II and have been doing some basic checks to see whether is fully functional. It is not putting out a full 100 watts in CW mode on the higher bands. I wonde
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00683.html (10,228 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Re: Paragon II (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:59:07 -1000
- Hi all, I have recently purchased a Paragon II and have been doing some basic checks to see whether is fully functional. It is not putting out a full 100 watts in CW mode on the higher bands. I wonde
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00685.html (9,891 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Re: Paragon II (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:11:42 -1000
- Hi all, Sorry about the previous postings wherin the power output data was illegible, here is another try. I have recently purchased a Paragon II and have been doing some basic checks to see whether
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00686.html (9,291 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu