Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+Ten\-Tec\s+301\s+Remote\s+tuning\s+knob\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+Ten\-Tec\s+301\s+Remote\s+tuning\s+knob\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: Ten-Tec 301 Remote tuning knob (score: 1): Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford); Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:46:52 -0800; Isn't this just a standard Omni V/VI optical encoder in a box? How hard would it be to adapt a 302 to this (obviously the 302's keypad would be unused)? Or, hmmm... a solution that would allow a 302; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00129.html (7,011 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RE: Ten-Tec 301 Remote tuning knob (score: 1): Author: ascanand@harris.com (Scanandoah, Alan); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:15:56 -0500; I built one up years ago, using a shaft encoder gleaned from a junk pile. Not an aesthetic masterpiece, but it certainly works well. Al, K2ZN Isn't this just a standard Omni V/VI optical encoder in a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00135.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]