- 1. [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
- Author: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <dock0evz@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:7:37 -0600
- Gang: Thanks for the notes already received, and I will be happy to hear more! Very useful. I am particularly interested in how "unidirectional" one of these vee beams *actually* is in practice. Than
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00378.html (8,729 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
- Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <n5wa@sport.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:11:02 -0600
- I would be interested in having a summary of the various opinions. Wes N5WA Gang: Thanks for the notes already received, and I will be happy to hear more! Very useful. I am particularly interested in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00379.html (9,269 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:35:36 -0500
- We all want to hear these replies Doc. Since they weren't made public we automatically assume they were negative. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <doc
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00381.html (9,885 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu