Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\:\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Vee\s+Beam\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <dock0evz@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:7:37 -0600
Gang: Thanks for the notes already received, and I will be happy to hear more! Very useful. I am particularly interested in how "unidirectional" one of these vee beams *actually* is in practice. Than
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00378.html (8,729 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <n5wa@sport.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:11:02 -0600
I would be interested in having a summary of the various opinions. Wes N5WA Gang: Thanks for the notes already received, and I will be happy to hear more! Very useful. I am particularly interested in
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00379.html (9,269 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] RE: Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:35:36 -0500
We all want to hear these replies Doc. Since they weren't made public we automatically assume they were negative. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "W.D. (Doc) Lindsey" <doc
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00381.html (9,885 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu