Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\s+Paragraphs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RE\s+Paragraphs\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: Jerry Stewart <ne4l@hughes.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:18:58 -0400; Weird. The email in my 'sent' box shows the eight paragraphs tat I composed the message in. I use Mozilla Thunderbird as my mail client, perhaps that is an issue? But my earlier posts shows the pa; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00030.html (6,626 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: Bernie Skoch via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:42:48 -0400; Nah. No worries. I am using AOL's email client (yes. I'm one of the last twelve people on planet Earth doing that, LOL). Your content is what matters, and I very much like reading it. 73, Bernie Weir; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00031.html (7,427 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:43:32 -0400; I am using AOL's email client (yes. I'm one of the last twelve people on planet Earth doing that, LOL). Your content is what matters, and I very much like reading it. 73, Bernie FWIW, I am using Thun; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00032.html (7,269 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:47:12 +0200; I fully agree with the criticism that a long text with no paragraph spacing is difficult to read, but this thread has brought up a very interesting aspect: differences in email clients. I prefer work; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00033.html (10,004 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:10:39 -0700; I suspect html is the problem. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00034.html (8,165 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:26:18 +0200; You're probably right, Jim, but being as the entire Internet is based upon HTML, it shouldn't be the problem! 73 Rick, DJ0IP I suspect html is the problem. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00035.html (8,617 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:34:48 -0700; Actually, the standard for many email reflectors is plain text. When html doesn't work on a reflector, it's likely that that reflector is plain text and that it ignores HTML. 73, Jim ________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00036.html (8,583 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] RE Paragraphs (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:39:55 +0200; Yes, but I wrote my comment about html in "2017", not 1997. Most of us have advanced beyond using our old Model 15 teletypes as our printer. 73- Rick Actually, the standard for many email reflectors; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00037.html (8,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]