Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RF\s+Speech\s+Processor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RF\s+Speech\s+Processor\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:05:28 -0500 (CDT); I fully agree, specially on the topic of transmitter performance. Fact: we don't need radios that operate on 12 volts. Most of today's radios are physically too large to be included in our auto's of; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00152.html (15,757 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:13:51 +0200; Bob, I loved every inch of your post until you said the government should (must) change the rules to require improvements. What if ARRL, DARC, RSGB, JARL, etc. all began flogging the OEMs for not del; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00153.html (16,348 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:04:22 -0500 (CDT); Oh I agree on non-popular government mandated issues. In general they are never viewed as popular. However until some authoritative branch steps in, there is no incentive for any forward action. Majo; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00154.html (20,011 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:52:49 -0400; On 6/14/2013 9:55 PM, GARY HUBER wrote: If the 715 is set correctly and its output gain is near or less than that of the microphone only, then the OMNI's DSP processor should not be overdriven. Yes..; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00156.html (11,791 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:06:19 -0400; I say we try Rick's market approach first, and only upon failing that, we invoke government action. Manufacturers are in it for the money, so if they are not selling radios, then they might be induce; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00157.html (10,578 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: Pete Ferrand <petef@sprynet.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:00:14 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Maybe this will help to understand a little bit about processing: First of all, the normalize function brings the highest peak of the audio up to the maximum level specified by the user. So if you no; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00158.html (16,408 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:38:19 -0500; Thanks Pete, You comments are well taken. Of the many articles I've read on the subject this one, http://g8jnj.webs.com/SSB%20intelligibility%20part%201.pdf by MARTIN EHRENFRIED, G8JNJ is among my fa; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00163.html (18,644 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]