Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RFI\s+and\s+Orion\s+Mic\s+connector\s+\-\s+bad\s+info\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RFI\s+and\s+Orion\s+Mic\s+connector\s+\-\s+bad\s+info\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] RFI and Orion Mic connector - bad info (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:37:12 +0000; Well, Rob, if your point is everyone should check their audio - and their signal generally - on all bands I agree with you. One of the local hams delights in giving "bad audio" reports and lives far; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00405.html (10,494 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] RFI and Orion Mic connector - bad info (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:42:51 -0500; Rob's comments are very correct and accurate on-air reports are good but not really good enough to my thinking. To which I ask a question "how many hams today use a monitor scope in line?" I would im; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00415.html (14,137 bytes)
23. [TenTec] RFI and Orion mic connector - bad info (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:06:55 +0000; Not my point. I have no idea how you ever got that out of what I wrote Pete. <<<On the other hand, if your point is that one should accept that any piece of gear is susceptable to RF and you must acc; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00422.html (8,995 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]