Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RIG\s+RETURN\s+$WAS\s+Ten\-Tec\s+used\/demo\s+list\s+August\s+5\,\s+2003$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RIG\s+RETURN\s+$WAS\s+Ten\-Tec\s+used\/demo\s+list\s+August\s+5\,\s+2003$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RIG RETURN (WAS Ten-Tec used/demo list August 5, 2003) (score: 1): Author: billrowlett@ccl-eng.com (Bill Rowlett); Date: Wed Aug 6 21:30:26 2003; cclStdMessage Stationery Well Bill, I would say that the first owner of the rig did not understand how Ten-Tec operates. He was used to a JA rig that when it breaks, you send it back and wait 6 month; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00116.html (8,239 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RIG RETURN (WAS Ten-Tec used/demo list August 5, 2003) (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu Aug 7 03:30:16 2003; Just not necessary to knock the other manufacturers. Not only is it wrong factually, but it makes us (Ten Tec users) look pretty insecure to many other hams who truly enjoy their JA rigs. I don't fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00120.html (7,647 bytes)
3. [TenTec] RIG RETURN (WAS Ten-Tec used/demo list August 5, 2003) (score: 1): Author: dufferjames@hotmail.com (James Duffer); Date: Thu Aug 7 13:12:56 2003; Agree, just read a post from the Woodbridge Wireless Inc. Amateur Radio Club, where a member sent his Kenwood for repair and he was very pleased in their work and fast turn around time. To: <tentec@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00122.html (8,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]