Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-10\s+Operation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-10\s+Operation\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-10 Operation (score: 1): Author: John Graves <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:16:05 -0400; I have a RX-10 that I am going through. A PO had installed nicads as a power source and they are over the hill. I was checking operation last night and heard signals on 20 & 40. The Tune control work; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00373.html (6,599 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RX-10 Operation (score: 1): Author: <jones_winston@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:16:56 -0500; I have an RX-10 that I haven't turned on in awhile, but I don't recall it oscillating. As I recall, the tune control brings a rapid rise in signal strength, but it shouldn't oscillate. 73, Winston K4; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00397.html (8,166 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RX-10 Operation (score: 1): Author: Gary E Norman <genorman1@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:22:25 -0400; No, it shouldn't be normal. I had a PM-3A years ago that would oscillate like this on receive when the dry cell batteries I was using got low. Don't know if it was due to the lower voltage or the hig; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00405.html (8,015 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] RX-10 Operation (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:40:20 -0600; Insufficient battery bypassing has been a classic transistor radio problem. The impedance of a new battery is so low there's no feed back but old batteries can lead to audio oscillations. A good elec; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00410.html (8,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]