Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-320\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: Gaardens@surferie.net (Rich Gaarden); Date: Fri Mar 7 10:34:40 2003; Hi Folks, Anyone have an RX-320 for sale? Rich KF3DQ gaardens@surferie.net; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00277.html (6,737 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:41:18 -0500; Except for a few extras provided by firmware, is the RX-320 essentially the same receiver as the Pegasus and Jupiter? The performance specs look the same. John N1JM; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00198.html (7,298 bytes)
3. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 23:14:50 -0000; The only real differences are no attenuator, no rf gain control, no noise blanker, no noise reduction, and no auto notch. Also, it runs at 1200 baud instead of 57600 baud so it responds much slower t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00200.html (8,325 bytes)
4. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:07:06 -0500; I concur. May be one of the best kept secrets around. I like to have an RF gain on a receiver so I simply wired a 500 ohm pot between the antenna cable and the antenna input connector. Really helps w; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00219.html (7,952 bytes)
5. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:58:10 -0500; Also, no FM reception. I agree, it's a great receiver. Mark; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00223.html (8,843 bytes)
6. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:44:12 -0500; Also, the rx320 does not have a TCXO. It drifts a few hundred hertz for an hour or so at startup. The Pegasus and Jupiter are rock stable right from the start. Carl Moreschi N4PY; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00225.html (9,967 bytes)
7. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:13:05 -0500; Never paid much attention to that as I keep mine running 24/7. -Lee; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00232.html (7,746 bytes)
8. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:58:25 -0500; Since there is no TXCO, how much does it drift, typically? John N1JM Also, no FM reception. I agree, it's a great receiver. Mark _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00233.html (9,819 bytes)
9. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: N4NT@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:02:55 -0500; What I wonder is if anybody has gotten it to receive synchronous AM. Mike N4NT To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00234.html (10,873 bytes)
10. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:10:44 -0600; John, I was surprised by Carl's post and although I do not doubt his results, I have not seen any significant drift on my RX-320. Mine seems to be very stable. 73, Rich To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00235.html (10,894 bytes)
11. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 01:18:24 -0000; The rx320 drifts about 100 to 400 hertz during the first hour or so it is on. It is quite stable after that. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00236.html (10,636 bytes)
12. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:19:10 -0800 (PST); Unless TT eventually releases a new firmware ROM (no FLASH ROM here) there won't ever be true synchronous AM in an RX-320. There may also be an issue of the ADSP-2101 DSP processor not truly being up; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00238.html (11,622 bytes)
13. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:56:38 -0500; Mike, There's no 'true' sync AM on the Pegaus or Jupiter. I did run across a program for the RX-320 that used the audio fed to the computer sound card to track frequency drift. It worked pretty well; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00247.html (12,274 bytes)
14. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:06:46 -0500; In my humble opinion, no modern radio should be released without an ethernet port... thats for sure. So many of us run networks now that it would be greatly appreciated. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00264.html (13,273 bytes)
15. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe); Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:11:46 -0500; Does anyone know anything about how the RX-320 communicates with the PC. = I know it is at 1200 baud, but is there any details about handshake, etc = for it? 73, Rich -- StripMime Report -- processed; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00550.html (6,468 bytes)
16. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:37:25 -0000; It's all explained in the rx320 programmer's guide on the tentec rxsquared site. You can just download it and read about it. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From: "Rich McCa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00556.html (7,060 bytes)
17. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: W7TS@ibm.net (Ken Kinyon); Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 12:42:22 -0700; Hi to all, March QST will have a review of the RX-320. it is available now on the members section of WWW.ARRL.ORG. It occurred to me while messing with my RX-320 that it, my laptop and a QRP transmit; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00180.html (6,925 bytes)
18. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: warhover <warhover@htc.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:10:16 -0600; Hi All, I am considering purchasing an RX-320 to be used as a stand-alone receiver. I have a few questions, which I hope can be answered here: What is the difference between the RX-320 and the RX-320; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00201.html (6,677 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:25:29 -0800 (PST); The "D" model adds a 12kHz IF out jack for outboard signal processing, it's generally targeted toward DRM broadcast decoders though other uses are certainly viable. The other notable change is that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00203.html (9,327 bytes)
20. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: 74010.2230@compuserve.com; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:39:30 -0500; Hi Ed, N9DG gave a perfect summary of the differences between the RX-320 and the Pegasus. Apart from those points, they are identical. I use the RX320 as a 2nd receiver to my Pegasus, using N4PY's so; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00209.html (8,218 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]