Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-350\s+Vs\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-350\s+Vs\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX-350 Vs Omni VI Plus (score: 1): Author: gr1ns@aol.com (gr1ns@aol.com); Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:22:39 EST; Okay, fair enough, I would hope with that kind of price difference the 340 would be superior to the Omni VI Plus. But how about a comparison for receive between the RX-350 and the Omni VI Plus? I do; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00088.html (7,511 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RX-350 Vs Omni VI Plus (score: 1): Author: MNEWELL1@austin.rr.com (Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC); Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:47:23 -0600; A Yahoo Group has been set up for the RX-350, but I don't know how active it is. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rx350/ -- Mike - WB4HUC Austin, TX filter more the Omni want; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00089.html (8,683 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]