Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-366\?\s+\-\s+Shielded\s+Filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\-366\?\s+\-\s+Shielded\s+Filters\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? - Shielded Filters (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:44:52 +0200; Kim, It is a fact that better shielding can improve filter blow-by, which means the ultimate attenuation is improved by use of shielding. This is very significant in rigs which depend on a single cry; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00461.html (13,299 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? - Shielded Filters (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:19:51 -0500; This is for the additional roofing filters in my RX366. I agree that shielding doesn't hurt but, as you note, it probably doesn't help all that much for this application, either. Kim N5OP It is a fac; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00467.html (13,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]