Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\s+340\s+vs\s+Orion\s+RX\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX\s+340\s+vs\s+Orion\s+RX\s+comparison\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX 340 vs Orion RX comparison (score: 1): Author: designer <designer@quickdata.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:53:33 -0700; Anyone have experience with the RX-340 compared to the RX in the Orion with ability to pull the weak ones out, scan for activity, etc. Thanks and 73, Paul ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00618.html (6,495 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] RX 340 vs Orion RX comparison (score: 1): Author: "George Bennett" <g.m.bennett@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 03:03:09 -0400; I have only had my Orion for a week so I don't really know how to get the most out of it yet. Having said that, my initial impression is that my RX-340 is superior in pulling out weak stations, sound; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00619.html (7,746 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] RX 340 vs Orion RX comparison (score: 1): Author: "Williams, Barry" <Bnwilliams@varco.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:29:27 -0500; I recently did the exercise of comparing the RX-340 with a separate transmitter (actually Pegasus) to the Orion, as far as amateur use only. The RX-340 is very limited in the close in distortion rang; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00621.html (8,971 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]