Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX320\s+performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+RX320\s+performance\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] RX320 performance (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 16:10:01 -0400; I've had a chance to do some preliminary testing (playing <g>) with my new RX320 that I purchased last weekend and have a couple of questions: 1) It seems that the frequency is off (to my ears) about; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00188.html (7,808 bytes)
2. [TenTec] RX320 performance (score: 1): Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 22:30:58 -0700; Mark, your results are probably correct. You can correct the offset on the RX-320 very well if you are using the N4PY software. I have both the Pegasus and the RX-320. The offset on my RX-320 is -119; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00198.html (9,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]