Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\'Iambic\'\s+keying\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\'Iambic\'\s+keying\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: 'Iambic' keying (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:05:09 -0700; I do not wish to step on anybody's toes but this is a minor sore point I would like to address. The word 'iambic' is nowadays taken as synonymous with squeeze or dual paddle keying. Technically, the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00156.html (11,086 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re: 'Iambic' keying (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:40:51 -1000; The key levers? Well, they are simply dual lever or dual paddle keys. But not, strictly speaking, iambic. Hi Al, You're right about the paddles not being iambic. You do need a dual lever or dual padd; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00159.html (9,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]