Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec_Orion\]\s+Continue\s+the\s+Yahoo\s+Orion\s+Reflector\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\[TenTec_Orion\]\s+Continue\s+the\s+Yahoo\s+Orion\s+Reflector\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Continue the Yahoo Orion Reflector? (score: 1): Author: tom@n4zpt.org (Tom Azlin, N4ZPT); Date: Mon May 26 16:01:49 2003; Hi Jim, Thanks for asking. My vote is to go ahead and kill the yahoo.com Orion reflector. I am a member of both reflectors and would prefer just the tentec@contesting.com reflector. I have an Orion o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01022.html (8,952 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Continue the Yahoo Orion Reflector? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue May 27 15:22:37 2003; Ok, for a bit more than 24 hours, I have been rcvg comments and votes, both private and on the reflectors. It is obvious that there are several reasons to continue the Orion discussion reflector on y; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01053.html (8,025 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Continue the Yahoo Orion Reflector? (score: 1): Author: N4NT_Mike.Hyder@charter.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Tue May 27 23:46:20 2003; What are the reasons for keeping it? 73, Mike; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01076.html (8,667 bytes)
4. [TenTec] RE: [TenTec_Orion] Continue the Yahoo Orion Reflector? (score: 1): Author: jaagomes@clix.pt (Jorge Gomes); Date: Wed May 28 21:27:45 2003; Jim, It was kind of you to ask. My vote? Keep the Orion list separate. Main reasons? It allows a well focused debate and lets Ten-Tec monitor, in an effective way, the real world opinions, difficulti; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01097.html (7,856 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]