Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+\~\s+1\/4\s+wave\s+160\s+doublet\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:35:08 -1000
Hi again from Kauai, Thank you for the many notes from both Ten Tec and Topband reflector users. Both groups offer some excellent technical advice from great folks!! A summary of notes and my respons
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00667.html (12,355 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:38:11 +0000
Thanks Jerry for the explanation; it makes sense. The solution for me would be to extend my feedline by 60 feet. I pictured feedline zig zagging across my back yard (gotta put it somewhere) and decid
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00668.html (8,065 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <geraldj@isunet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:16:50 -0500
That applies here. The antenna won't work a bit better with the added feedline, just the tuner will be easier to tune. And that's why those magic lengths are no longer described in modern antenna man
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00669.html (7,978 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:56:00 -0400
Jim Reid wrote: Conclusions: I might not hear much more again, but at least I could participate in 160 meter activity around the islands out here, what there is of it. Jim, "Don't worry, be happy". J
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00674.html (8,549 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:08:33 -1000
Hi again Jim, I live in Hilo and use and inverted L on 160 meters. The vertical section is only about 40 feet long, the rest is approximately horizontal, rising up to about 50 feet and then dropping
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00678.html (9,562 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:19:48 -1000
Thanks again for the many continuing comments/ suggestions about my 160 antenna situation! Last evening, I fired up on 1838 kHz. Using the Palstar AT4K, was able to reach about 1.2:1 vswr as read her
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00693.html (8,438 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1)
Author: "Jules" <k8jk@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:08:14 -0400
Jim, I haven't seen this mentioned yet. How about putting inductors on each of the legs of the doublet you have or an 80m trap on each end of the 80 meter inverted V with wire (doesn't have to be hig
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00803.html (15,734 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu