Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+About\s+the\s+incivility\s+of\s+our\s+posts\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:39:42 EST
somewhat ill-tempered (not to mention technically deficient - sorry) and we responded in kind. << OK, let me elaborate. I am for exchange of ideas, arguments, discussing problems, explaining or learn
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00841.html (12,029 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:47:50 EST
Sorry about the typo, should read "You guys..." Yuri _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00843.html (6,647 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:08:01 +0000
Yuri you'll perhaps understand that to some, your posts might seem to indicate that they're about mostly arguing and lecturing. You aren't the only fellow here who is a contester. There is quite a bi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00848.html (13,160 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:06:10 -0600
Yuri: I appreciate your comments, so let me say this. You need to have a pretty thick skin to post on some of these boards. It doesn't matter whether it is ham radio, fishing or stock chatboards. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00853.html (14,506 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:19:29 -0600
You need to have a pretty thick skin to post on some of these boards. It doesn't matter whether it is ham radio, fishing or stock chatboards. They are all pretty much the same. If you voice an opinio
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00865.html (18,788 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "John" <jlockj@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:05:52 -0600
Hi Dave, Thanks for your post - it's evident you exercised some self control, but still did a good job of getting your points across. I have no emotional involvement with the Orion (yet), however, I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00924.html (16,129 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "John" <jlockj@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:39:32 -0600
The previous post was meant to go only to Dave - another person zapped by the list defaults - sorry! 73, John W0DC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00925.html (8,216 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:45:17 EST
any more of that guy's arrogant/ pompous/ bombastic postings. Seems like his rudeness should be enough to get him booted off the list. (I tried to determine who the list manager is with no luck) I wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00926.html (8,478 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "Bernard" <wtrone@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:31:12 -0600
Sorry to see you go! As I have previously posted, you sometimes have to have a very thick skin to post on some of these boards! It may have been better to just have IGNORED those posts that you found
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00931.html (9,744 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:45:09 -0800 (PST)
Yuri, I value your contributions and hope you'll participate in the orion@contesting.com reflector if you are truly leaving this reflector. Personally, I find heated, in-depth discussion invigorating
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00938.html (8,421 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:37:30 -0500
Yuri..... I agree with Barry. The technical content of your post are interesting and valuable. It is the TONE of your emails that get everybody, myself included, angry with you. Please realize this i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00942.html (10,052 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: W3UIO <amishbuggy37@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:08:31 -0800 (PST)
HiYuri, I didn't bother to read all the posts on the Ten-Tec reflector concerning you; infact, I delete most posts without reading them. I read enough to realize that your remark about the people who
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00949.html (9,505 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: Richard Hemingway <rheming1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:17:16 -0600
Larry, Your comment below is interesting to me for two reasons. First, I just sold my PROII and bought a Jupiter (I used to have an Omni VI which I liked very much). Second, I was on the Icom groups
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00957.html (9,641 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu