Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Alternate\s+Power\s+Switching\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:31:15 -0500
This concerns (loosely): Hi, Gentlemen: I've just purchased a battery system to serve as backup to my Ten-Tec station. Power from either the power supply or the batteries would be switched with a SPD
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00174.html (9,154 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:53:06 -0500
Not bad except most unregulated supplies don't quite run 24, just 18 or 22 but in any case the energy efficiency is rotten. You need to protect the world from the batteries being capable of a kilo am
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00180.html (10,289 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:32:13 -0500
"But if it was my FET regulated linear supply it runs about 85% at 20 amps load... Unlike Astrons and the like at under 50% efficiency..." But the effective duty cycle is real low figuring receiving
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00186.html (8,677 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:40:52 -0500
Because of transformer and bleeder resistor looses, efficiency while receiving is even poorer, and with receive time much longer than transmit, the overall energy consumption is still way more than i
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00187.html (7,917 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:49:33 -0500
Jerry remarked: "Because of transformer and bleeder resistor looses, efficiency while receiving is even poorer, and with receive time much longer than transmit, the overall energy consumption is stil
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00188.html (8,108 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:58:48 -0500
It wasn't good. Electricity was 2 cents per KWH. Not 15 and becoming in short supply. Few of us ran a receiver 18 hours a day those days either. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00189.html (7,890 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 07:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
OK All you guys who are experimenting with burning your houses down, PLEASE STOP IT. Don't connect 10 power supplies together and don't connect a Battery up to your Ten Tec power Supply in any way sh
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00231.html (11,979 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:41:08 -0500
If you aren't very sure of proper polarity of the power supply and battery you have already fried the radio! Battery acid from a poorly welded case will eat floors, including concrete. Fumes from cha
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00232.html (8,798 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1)
Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:57:50 -0500
"......... OK All you guys who are experimenting with burning your houses down, PLEASE STOP IT............etc, etc....... Did you remember to take your medicine today, OM? Roy -- FAQ on WWW: http://w
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00238.html (7,808 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu