Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+CW\s+on\s+60M\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Thu May 15 07:46:50 2003
About... "BTW, you CAN send CW on these bands... you would just need to have audio keying on a USB transmission... which is supported via some soundcard software like MixW. It certainly meets the let
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00369.html (7,525 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY)
Date: Thu May 15 08:22:45 2003
That's not true. Sending an audio tone would be indistinguishable from a CW carrier and in clear violation of the rule. Carl Moreschi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00370.html (8,483 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: cherry@getnet.net (Jim FitzSimons)
Date: Thu May 15 12:49:48 2003
Is there a link to the new information of the 60M allocation? When will it be open for us in the US? Will the N4PY software support a the 60M band? Jim W7ANF
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00381.html (9,462 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY)
Date: Thu May 15 13:37:49 2003
I will have version 2.08 of my N4PY Pegasus/Jupiter control program out on June 1. It will have full support for the 60 meter band for the Pegasus and Jupiter. Carl Moreschi N4PY a was
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00386.html (10,474 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: csegar@mindspring.com (Cliff)
Date: Thu May 15 14:41:48 2003
This thought is very currious. Since I am one of the newer licensed hams (even tho I first studied code from an Ameco record!), all the question pools I have gone thru have a question to the affect o
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00389.html (8,214 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: n4xy@earthlink.net (Ed Tanton)
Date: Thu May 15 14:56:50 2003
"thought process"??? What thought process? 73 Ed Tanton N4XY <n4xy@earthlink.net> Ed Tanton N4XY 189 Pioneer Trail Marietta, GA 30068-3466 website: http://www.n4xy.com All emails <IN> & <OUT> checked
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00391.html (8,493 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY)
Date: Thu May 15 15:42:51 2003
Very strange to me too Cliff....?????? 73 de Lee, WA3FIY 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00400.html (8,293 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Thu May 15 18:43:10 2003
I looked thru the FCC regs and discovered that the 'J3E' designator is a requirement for voice and sound (not telegraphy or digital data) transmission exclusively. That is why even though it is possi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00417.html (8,766 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu