- 1. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
- Date: Thu May 15 07:46:50 2003
- About... "BTW, you CAN send CW on these bands... you would just need to have audio keying on a USB transmission... which is supported via some soundcard software like MixW. It certainly meets the let
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00369.html (7,525 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY)
- Date: Thu May 15 08:22:45 2003
- That's not true. Sending an audio tone would be indistinguishable from a CW carrier and in clear violation of the rule. Carl Moreschi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00370.html (8,483 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: cherry@getnet.net (Jim FitzSimons)
- Date: Thu May 15 12:49:48 2003
- Is there a link to the new information of the 60M allocation? When will it be open for us in the US? Will the N4PY software support a the 60M band? Jim W7ANF
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00381.html (9,462 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: n4py@qvssoftware.com (N4PY)
- Date: Thu May 15 13:37:49 2003
- I will have version 2.08 of my N4PY Pegasus/Jupiter control program out on June 1. It will have full support for the 60 meter band for the Pegasus and Jupiter. Carl Moreschi N4PY a was
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00386.html (10,474 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: csegar@mindspring.com (Cliff)
- Date: Thu May 15 14:41:48 2003
- This thought is very currious. Since I am one of the newer licensed hams (even tho I first studied code from an Ameco record!), all the question pools I have gone thru have a question to the affect o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00389.html (8,214 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: n4xy@earthlink.net (Ed Tanton)
- Date: Thu May 15 14:56:50 2003
- "thought process"??? What thought process? 73 Ed Tanton N4XY <n4xy@earthlink.net> Ed Tanton N4XY 189 Pioneer Trail Marietta, GA 30068-3466 website: http://www.n4xy.com All emails <IN> & <OUT> checked
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00391.html (8,493 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com (WA3FIY)
- Date: Thu May 15 15:42:51 2003
- Very strange to me too Cliff....?????? 73 de Lee, WA3FIY 73 de Lee, WA3FIY wa3fiy@radioadv.com
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00400.html (8,293 bytes)
- 8. [TenTec] Re: CW on 60M (score: 1)
- Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
- Date: Thu May 15 18:43:10 2003
- I looked thru the FCC regs and discovered that the 'J3E' designator is a requirement for voice and sound (not telegraphy or digital data) transmission exclusively. That is why even though it is possi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00417.html (8,766 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu