Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Continuing\s+Orion\s+evaluation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Continuing\s+Orion\s+evaluation\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1): Author: kh7t@arrl.net (John Buck); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:58:41 2003; Hi Mark, Glad to see that you got an Orion and are putting it through it's paces. Mine came in the first round and I have noted many of the same things you have encountered. I assume you are using th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00193.html (10,423 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon Aug 11 17:36:10 2003; John, KH7T, wrote, in part: Hmmm, what is the chance that the Dragonball processor will itself have to be replaced; if it is "saturated", unable to perform all that it is designed/hoped for? If "dits; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00195.html (8,759 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Mon Aug 11 18:57:33 2003; John, I am very pleased that your ORION experience has been a good one for you. It is clear that when the ORION is working properly, it is indeed a very good radio with excellent performance. Jim Rei; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00196.html (12,028 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation (score: 1): Author: w9oj@peoplepc.com (Mike Manship); Date: Mon Aug 11 19:56:50 2003; By this line of reasoning we can assume that Ten Tec never got the Omni series to be acceptable because there were so many different variations (545, 545B,546,546B,546C,562,563 and 564) then they ju; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00198.html (7,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]