Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+E\-HAM\s+Reviews\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:19:00 -0000
W4ZV, with all due respect, I wouldn't take K1UO result on CQ WW CW on 160 m as a high praise to undisputed Orion RX capabilities! This is such a small single sample: 160: 172 18 62 I often laugh on
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00617.html (7,272 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:54:10 -0500
Hi Mario, S56A wrote: W4ZV, with all due respect, I wouldn't take K1UO result on CQ WW CW on 160 m as a high praise to undisputed Orion RX capabilities! This is such a small single sample: 160: 172 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00619.html (9,070 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:18:46 -0800 (PST)
My 2 cents on this beat-to-death topic: Newer rigs are more critically graded on eHam compared to older rigs. So yes, I take the 5.0 rating of the 765/781 and, especially, the 950SDX with a large gra
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00620.html (7,225 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:31:43 +0000
Barry N1EU wrote: Barry You are absolutely correct IMO. Your shack, your environment and your opinion are what matter in the final analysis. But before we get to the final analysis we need to have a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00621.html (8,558 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:36:44 -0000
Do you know how far is his vertical from the sea? I accept that as a valid tech argument but majority of users are not aware of it! W0YG case you quote next is rare in big USA. IP2 problems nonexist
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00624.html (7,438 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:35:41 -0500
Hi Mario, Closest sea is approximately 30 km toward SSE direction but about 500 km toward NE direction (Europe). http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/maps-maponly/usr=~3fdf8ce3.5b0fe.27e5.6/c=9/formNa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00628.html (9,244 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:20:25 EST
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU What headphones did you use? :-) Yuri _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00629.html (7,598 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Lloyd Westbrook" <westbrok@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:27:20 -0500
Incidentally, I have had this call since 1996, my OM is Lloyd W4AO, he is going to listen on 75 some in hopes the guy comes back on. Thanks 88 Ruby K4RW ______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00630.html (8,305 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:23:58 +0000
I'll bet your headphones seem a bit tight from time to time. Dave K8MN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00635.html (7,864 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:56:29 -0000
the Bavarian Contest Club (BCC) which I am proud to be a member of. We hold both the CW and SSB records. ALL transceivers used for this were Kenwood TS-850's (which is a 1-generation-old "mid-range"
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00638.html (8,435 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:01:42 -0000
I'll bet your headphones seem a bit tight from time to time. Dave K8MNNO, Sir, I use cheap and light PC SB headset for 300-2.700 Hz audio with ordinary electret microphone on my IC-735 1984 vintage!
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00639.html (8,328 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:29:01 -0000
and routinely desensed my FT-1000MP whenever he came on the band. Yaesu could have done a much better job with a second mixer which suffers from signals stronger then S9+10 dB. There is no separate
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00640.html (8,086 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:53:52 -0500 (EST)
Next time anyone wants to meet at Parker's Maple Barn, let me know. ;-) 73 Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00647.html (8,293 bytes)

14. RE: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:00:44 +0100
Mario, what's your point? In the LX7A operation, all of the amps were standard ham amps (most made in USA) and some only put out 1000w! I didn't personally operate the CN8W station but I personally k
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00651.html (10,304 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu