- 1. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: kw0d@netexpress.net (Dave Kamp, KW0D)
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 21:25:00 -0600
- Okay, this is off the T-T topic, but since there's enough rattling around, I'll put in my observations. The FluidMotion antenna was on display at the Dayton Hamvention last year. It is a very interes
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00044.html (10,223 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:31:22 -0600
- Thanks Dave, a very nice write up, but then as you describe the reeling out of the tape, I could not help but think of the DLT tape drives where a finger hooks onto the end of the tape and pulls it o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00045.html (8,274 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: ny9h@arrl.net (Bill Steffey)
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:27:58 -0600
- Hope that the "demo" I saw at Dayton got fixed. I was there at a bad time, when the beryllium or whatever tape was Not feeding properly and was all jammed up. The guys were trying to get it fixed wit
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00059.html (8,712 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: kw0d@netexpress.net (Dave Kamp, KW0D)
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 09:52:00 -0600
- Well, like anything developed by imagination, but made from real materials, there's bound to be some problems. How's the definition go... "Civil Engineers build things that aren't supposed to move, b
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00060.html (10,323 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 11:27:35 -0600
- Easy - we build the stuff that works! <:} 73/72/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56th year and it just kee
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00065.html (8,529 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] Re: Fluid motion antenna (score: 1)
- Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:29:29 -0600
- You can accept compromise in the element spacing but then you are back to having a less than optimum situation, just as you do if you have traps. Linear decoupling has not lumped elements with loss,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00078.html (8,204 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu