Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+JRC\s+bearings\s+needed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+JRC\s+bearings\s+needed\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: JRC bearings needed (score: 1): Author: AL_LORONA@HP-USA-om33.om.hp.com (AL_LORONA@HP-USA-om33.om.hp.com); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 14:25:47 -0400; Hi, Alec, Try www.jrc.co.jp. While you're at it, you may want to check out: www.kenwood.com www.yaesu.com www.icom.com www.kachina.com Oh, and don't bother checking www.tentec.com, there's nothing th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00391.html (7,853 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: JRC bearings needed (score: 1): Author: whowell@hq.nasa.gov (Scott Howell); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 15:24:13 -0400; what's a jrc. that one of those new fangled rigs? barrings? didn't know those were used anymore. 73 de Scott/n3byy -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00393.html (7,593 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: JRC bearings needed (score: 1): Author: pito@nera.no (Piotr Tomczak); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 09:50:50 +0100; Hello Scott... Even if I use a TenTec I must admit that they too produce nice rigs. Time to learn that Scott ! The JST 245 is very good one but it is heavy like a hell....Twice that OmniVI+ weights.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00399.html (8,260 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: JRC bearings needed (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 06:21:07 -0400; Rigs like the JST 245 weigh more than TenTecs because they have an internal power supply. Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: Piotr Tomczak <pito@nera.no> To: Scott Howell <whowell@hq.nasa.gov> C; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00402.html (8,993 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]