Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+ONLY\s+90\s+WATTS\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+ONLY\s+90\s+WATTS\!\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: wb2vuo@juno.com (William K Hibbert); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:40:09 EST; Sorry to the majority of the List, but my QRP leanings caught on the edge of this thread... First off, which is correct, the Bird or the Rig? I don't recall the tolerance on a Bird 43 (I haven't used; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00176.html (8,757 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: k8mn@clinet.fi (Dave Heil); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 17:00:00 -0800; That would certainly depend on what you're driving with it. Guess that saves me the trouble of adding, "Who?" 73, Dave Heil OH2/K8MN, A22MN, 9L1US, J52US downtown Helsinki "You have to be LOUD!" -- M; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00177.html (8,245 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:09:42 -0500; . Quibbling over 1/2 a Those burgers keep getting smaller too. I say, keep striving for perfection. That loss of 10 watts could mean an even greater loss if attempting to drive an amplifier to 1.5kw!; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00178.html (7,516 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 12:31:23 -0500; If you're referring to my earlier post, the problem has been corrected thanks to Troy's suggestion of adjusting R46 (ALC Limiting) on the Omni Six's 9 MHz Mixer/IF Board. This board is replaced by Te; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00179.html (11,134 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N); Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 12:39:11 EST; I haven't tested this with the Omni VI, but with my pair of Corsairs, I ran the voltage up to almost 15V (13.8 recommended) and was able to get a little more output power that way. Paul, KB8N -- FAQ; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00193.html (7,308 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: gfbike@millcomm.com (gfbike); Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 21:34:26 -0600; Lots of folks fretting about 10 watts less than the rated 100 watts!! At the receiving end of things, this much power drop makes about 0.2 db difference! What's the big deal? Clean your coax connecti; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00201.html (7,526 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Re: ONLY 90 WATTS! (score: 1): Author: owen@piper.eeel.nist.gov (James C. Owen, III); Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:51:18 -0500 (EST); The proper way to get 100W output is to follow the instructions and adjust the proper internal pot for an indicated 100W on the Bird 43 or whatever you use. If the adjustment is set for say 90W and y; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00207.html (8,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]