Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Pegasus\/RX320\s+RCVR\s+Commonality\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Pegasus\/RX320\s+RCVR\s+Commonality\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Pegasus/RX320 RCVR Commonality (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:30:35 -0700 (PDT); Vin, Perhaps I can give you some additional thoughts on the RX320 and the Pegasus because I do have both. Even though the RX320 and Pegasus do share a lot in common, the Pegasus is a significantly be; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00221.html (8,461 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Pegasus/RX320 RCVR Commonality (score: 1): Author: kc0dxf@yahoo.com (Robert Wooldridge); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:25:15 -0700 (PDT); I have thought the same thing. I would think that any kind of re-use of parts and designs would be economically beneficial. There does seem to be some slight differences in the receiver specs. How si; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00212.html (8,728 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re: Pegasus/RX320 RCVR Commonality (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com); Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:34:32 -0500; In a discussion with Scott Robbins at Dayton this year, he described the Pegasus receiver to me as being based on the RX-320 design. We didn't get into what the variations, if any, might be. Likewise; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00213.html (7,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]