Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Solid\s+State\s+Amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Solid\s+State\s+Amps\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:21:23 -0500; Well, It seems no matter how I look at it , someone will say I'm wrong. I am beginning to wonder if I AM in the wrong hobby. It seems that it is overrun at times with Conceited, egotistical, know it; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00267.html (7,188 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:30:36 -0800 (PST); I tried posting this right after I read your post but it failed to post, hmm, maybe I need another government license. Lets try it again: Personally, I would not have given that response the curiosit; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00270.html (8,257 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:32:29 -0500; Whats all the hubub, bub?? What kind of grief have you been getting? I have been casually watching the thread on the solid state amp thing. I don't see the problem. Your original post about the Tokyo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00271.html (7,905 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:49:58 -0500; Let's put things in perspective: The ban on commercially built & commercially sold amplifiers covering approximately 20 - 35 MHz (and please let's not bog down in the specific technicalities) dates b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00297.html (9,928 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:07:31 -0800 (PST); Yes why don't we Ron. I have known you for over 20 years and you have not changed, still pissing most people off you come in contact with! RESPECTFULLY.......CURT KRELIC K3EY I would also respective; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00315.html (8,360 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:05:38 -0500; At 06:49 PM 12/8/2003 -0500, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote: I would also respectively disagree with the notion that an amplifier that gives you 500 W out for 4 W input on 10 meters is automatically assum; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00319.html (8,500 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]