Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Jupiter\s+SENSITIVITY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+TenTec\s+Digest\,\s+Jupiter\s+SENSITIVITY\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Jupiter SENSITIVITY (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:49:39 EST; No, it doesn't help! It is true if everybody would be using Inverted Vee antenna in a city environment on low bands. The lower you go on frequency, the more noise you encounter (you "don't need sensi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00747.html (9,647 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Jupiter SENSITIVITY (score: 1): Author: Allan Henry Kaplan <w1ael@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:00:45 -0500; Bruce and others, Below perhaps 12 meters, atmospheric noise absolutely overwhelms the sensitivity of modern receivers. By that, I mean that scientific studies by CCIR have shown conlusively that atm; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00745.html (8,079 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]