Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+\~\s+1\/4\s+wave\s+160\s+doublet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Re\:\s+\~\s+1\/4\s+wave\s+160\s+doublet\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re: Topband: Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:42:09 -0400; Jim and others, I'd propose an alternate idea. I'd look into placing a good quality inductor across the antenna terminals. That might cancel the reactance while raising the impedance. The inductor wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00804.html (9,951 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re: Topband: Re: ~ 1/4 wave 160 doublet (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:42:09 -0400; Jim and others, I'd propose an alternate idea. I'd look into placing a good quality inductor across the antenna terminals. That might cancel the reactance while raising the impedance. The inductor wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00805.html (9,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]