Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:IC\-707\s+vs\.\s+DX\-70\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Re\:IC\-707\s+vs\.\s+DX\-70\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Re:IC-707 vs. DX-70 (score: 1): Author: winjones@ix.netcom.com (Winston F. Jones); Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 15:26:50 -0500 (CDT); I think we Ten-Tec users should be more friendly to the person who wondered onto this reflector, asking about comparisons between the Icom IC-706 and the Alinco DX-70. I'd suggest he also think about; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00094.html (7,717 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Re:IC-707 vs. DX-70 (score: 1): Author: edn4pk@voyageronline.net (Ed); Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 21:29:43 -0400; Hear, Hear...Bravo Ed N4PK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00099.html (6,867 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Re:IC-707 vs. DX-70 (score: 1): Author: walt@jove.acs.unt.edu (Walter S Delesandri); Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 20:29:40 -0500 (CDT); It appears that ten-tec-ees (or is it -ers?) feel the same way about riceboxes that british car enthusiasts feel about Miatas!!! Walt WB5LJW Collins/Atlas powered (past and future T-T owner!!) Don't; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00100.html (7,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]