Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rebel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rebel\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Carl Winkles <jcwinks@att.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT); I see they have the Rebel QRP rig on the website now. It looks pretty neat. Carl, K4SEV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00012.html (7,219 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:39:10 +0200; I'm hoping someone speaks out with some on-the-air experience with the rig. 73 Rick, DJ0IP I see they have the Rebel QRP rig on the website now. It looks pretty neat. Carl, K4SEV __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00013.html (7,803 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:42:47 +0000; internal jumpers to change bands? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00014.html (8,101 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:33:06 -0400; The Rebel Model 506 is intended to be a platform that attracts a whole different set of hams. Those that are software developers and want to tinker around with some code to make the rig do what they; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00015.html (9,374 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: PC Anderson <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:54:28 -0400; Really sad?????? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00016.html (10,662 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:52:54 -0400; Gee, PC, I do not understand your comment. Are you down on the idea? What could be sad about a new product? Either it sells or it does not, but I cannot see any down side to this. Either it suits you; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00017.html (12,292 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 08:19:07 -0400; PC Anderson, It is ok if it doesn't fit everyone's needs. I look at this new venture like this. 1 - We are trying to draw new blood into the amateur market. The biggest gains in Amateur Radio come in; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00019.html (8,873 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Mike Chatfield <mikechat@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:53:00 -0500; John, Well said, we appreciate your efforts. I deeply respect Ten-TEC for its efforts and products, and its outstanding service and support (software and hardware). 73 Mike W0BBC On 9/4/2013 7:19 AM,; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00020.html (9,612 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 09:03:29 -0400; One other item I forgot to mention. When re-reading my posts, I might have come across as this is not a product for regular hams who want to buy a QRP rig and have it work and do what they want right; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00022.html (9,046 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 08:48:48 -0500; John, I'm with you on this one. While the Rebel is competitive as a QRP rig in its own right, I also see it positioned for someone like a young teen neighbor of mine who (while I haven't had much tim; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00023.html (8,892 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:03:26 -0500; I agree with John and Al and others on this. QRP is not for everyone just as QRO is not for everyone. Having been a ham for over 50 years and I've worked both and frankly I'm surprised at how well th; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00024.html (12,474 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:12:55 -0500; I remember one dark morning when my Elmer stated that Color TV would never last! Too much Circuitry and too complicated. This same man told me that SSB Phone was too hard to get right and would Never; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00025.html (11,585 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 18:44:44 +0200; I think Wade's Emer was "Elmer Fudd"! (hi) Guys, the core of this is not about the Rebel, not at all. It's about how we each feel about Software Defined Radios, ESPECIALLY when they have no knobs. We; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00026.html (12,841 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: John Henry <jhenry@tentec.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:18:44 -0400; The group for the Rebel is already created and running on Yahoo. Richy N2ZD started it up back in May during Dayton, and it has grown quite a bit since then. Several developers already going to take; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00027.html (8,647 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:56:16 -0500; Hello Rick, No, he wasn't Elmer Fudd. But, he was an old Fuddy Duddy. Although he held the Commercial First Class, I could never get the point across that a Bi-Polar Transistor mimicked the Triode Tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00028.html (15,198 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:44:18 -0400; I like how Wade puts it. I will donate a bottle of REBEL YELL BOURBON bourbon to the first official meeting of Rebel radio owners at the TenTec Hamfest or other gathering. -- K8JHR -- .......... This; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00030.html (8,811 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: "Frank Kirschner" <KF6E@mail.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:21:15 -0400; As someone who predicted technology advances and failures for a living, and was usually right, I would say the Rebel is one small step for a ham, one giant leap for ham-kind. This will help bring int; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00035.html (9,961 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:59:50 -0400; Right... but this is for old farts, too! ;-) The guys I had lunch with and discussed all sorts of Arduino based gear this week are both over 65! Each of us had something to present to the others - I; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00038.html (9,398 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Dale Barrett <dale@alberlynn.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:07:16 -0500; This will help bring into ham radio the computer-literate young people of today. These are the people who, if this were the 1950s and 1960s, would have come into amateur radio because it was the main; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00041.html (11,586 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Rebel (score: 1): Author: Dexter Alexander <dexlalex@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:21:23 -0400; The Rebel has excited at least one "old guy". I forwarded John Henry's post to a ham friend yesterday, and my friend ordered the Rebel the same day. His interest was piqued by the open source code, a; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-09/msg00044.html (8,208 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]