Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Reciever\s+comparisons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Reciever\s+comparisons\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: nw4p@martha.xtn.net (nw4p@martha.xtn.net); Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 22:33:46 -0500; Gentlemen, Is it correct that the Pegasus/Jupiter/320 have the same reciever? Too, has anyone done an actual side by side comparison with and Omni 6+ and either the Jupiter or the Pegasus on recieve; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00046.html (7,716 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 12:56:38 -0000; The Jupiter and the Pegasus are exactly the same internal transmitter and receiver. They even share the very same bords inside. The Jupiter is a Pegasus with a built in front panel computer. I think; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00048.html (8,882 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:31:39 -0500; Sensitivity is cheap... A 30 cent FET will give you all the sensitivity your ears can handle... Selectivity, stability, accuracy, intercept levels, harmonic rejection, IF rejection, audio fidelity ,; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00049.html (7,673 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: nw4p@martha.xtn.net (nw4p@martha.xtn.net); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 08:36:12 -0500; Gentlemen, Thanks for all the comments on the 6+ versus the Jupiter. I guess I'll just keep the Omni 6+ and save my money for the Jupiter as a second rig. Now that creates another problem !! How do I; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00050.html (7,698 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: Ken & Linda Burrough" <w8keb@1st.net (Ken & Linda Burrough); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:06:22 -0500; Hi All I bought my Jupiter as an replacement for my old friend, the Triton IV Digital. I wanted the general coverage receiver and WRAC bands. I went into the Jupiter thinking it would be a FUN RIG an; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00053.html (9,794 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: mauro@idt.net (Bob Mauro - PeopleNet); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 10:37:01 -0500 (EST); According to Ten Tec the Jupiter has the same sensivity as the Scout and the Omni 6+ is heads above both. Well...i have both and agree. But i'd LOVE to have the Jupiter as my backup rig. Bob Mauro, M; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00054.html (8,578 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: jmlowman@ix.netcom.com (Jim Lowman); Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:37:01 -0800; Well, Richard, having a wife who is a ham makes things simpler. :-) Even if she doesn't have privileges on HF, having spent more than 30 years listening to me about the hobby, she seems to understand; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00058.html (8,956 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Reciever comparisons (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 17:37:16 -0500; Get three then agree to reduce inventory. Best Regards, Mike Hyder N4NT@chartertn.net Johnson City, TN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administr; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00065.html (8,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]