Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SB200\s+and\s+SB220\s+Differences\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SB200\s+and\s+SB220\s+Differences\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: KeithWarthog@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:17:48 EST; HI Was just wondering what the main differences in these two models were? Keith _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00872.html (6,766 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:04:19 -0800 (PST); power..... 572's/ 3-500's KeithWarthog@aol.com wrote:HI Was just wondering what the main differences in these two models were? Keith _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00876.html (7,501 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:52:45 -1000; SB-200 uses a pair of 572B triodes. The most I have seen come out of and SB-200 is maybe 800 Watts, and I suspect there was some reflected power making the power reading higher than real output. Six; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00879.html (7,325 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:16:33 -0500; SB-200 used 572-B's & ran about 600 W max output. SB-220 used 3-500Z's & ran about 1200-1500 W max output. 73, ron wn3vaw "I'd give real money if he'd just shut up!" Dr. Leonard McCoy, "Start Trek VI; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00880.html (7,783 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:46:34 +0100; The ORIGINAL SB-200 did put out about 800w. Heathkit soon changed it to reduce the power to about 600w. The 800w version was killing the sales of the SB-220 and they wanted to have a greater differen; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00882.html (8,705 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Greenberg N5BEA" <larrylg1@excite.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:31:14 -0500 (EST); I operated a SB200 for a long time. It's not going to produce over about 600 watts pep even with a new set of "Killer Bs". Operating at 220 nd greatly quietens the amp and increases it's efficiency.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00891.html (9,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]