Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\-1000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SDR\-1000\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:11:53 EDT; wel folks, I fixed a problem with my mic and all my scratchies went away. I am using 2.056 on original Orion and it is working quite nicely , thank you. I do so love to see folks who don't own the ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00314.html (12,111 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:06:59 -0700 (PDT); And fron what I have heard the Flex radio SDR-X.is going to be a $10,000 I guess getting it right is going to cost a lot more money. I will stick with my Orion II. 73 John WB4QDA -- Original Message; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00315.html (8,536 bytes)
23. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:46:26 -0700 (PDT); You are right in many aspects the SDR-1000 does not equal the Orion, it surpasses it. I own 2 SDR-1000's and one Orion. My Orion has been relegated to being my 75M ragchew radio because the SDR is be; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00320.html (10,293 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "steve moore" <hondo1@kitusa.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:23:32 -0500; I was going to give the Orion another year to develope. But this post changes my mind. Hello SDR or FT2000. wd0ct _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00321.html (12,235 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:56:28 -0700; You make this kind of decision on one guys post? You deserve what you get ..... Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00323.html (7,850 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "steve moore" <hondo1@kitusa.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:16:20 -0500; I've been reading all the posts about the Orion and SDR for months. I've read enough. And what would I get besides something that actually works as claimed? __________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00324.html (8,643 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:17:48 -0700; The Orion III (or whatever it's to be called) will probably be at least that much, assuming the wish list I've been reading here gets implemented. (I haven't seen anything about hyperspace comm chan; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00325.html (9,728 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:20:58 -0500; Good bye, Steve, We're gonna miss ya. Right. Larry, N0XB Be sure to unsubscribe: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec I was going to give the Orion another year to develope. But this p; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00326.html (13,592 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "steve moore" <hondo1@kitusa.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:27:16 -0500; Thanks for the well wishes. It is nice to hear from a loyalist storm trooper. wd0ct -- Original Message -- From: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00327.html (14,147 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 07:11:36 -0400; If you're suggesting that users don't post messages to the reflector when they believe they have found problems, I respectfully disagree. I want to hear of others' experiences, both positive AND nega; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00340.html (8,682 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <crgreene@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:00:19 -0400; Guys, My 2 cents. Actually, the SDR-1000 competes with the K2, OMNI-VI, and similar radios in its price class. It is about equal in performance, some things a little better, some not as good. I have; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00345.html (10,932 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:58:00 -0400; Hello Lee and all - I don't understand your comment on Dxing and contesting on CW. The SDR has only one RX which makes split operation MUCH more difficult especially when all the controls are on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00349.html (10,979 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:40:53 -0600; AGREE! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00358.html (9,153 bytes)
34. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:39:26 -0700 (PDT); Tom The Orion presently is the winner as far as tail ending in a pileup, however that will change. The SDR presently uses click and shoot tuning which is different from any other system I have seen i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00364.html (13,614 bytes)
35. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:06:07 -0400; W9OY: What that means is that I can put multiple independent transmitter outputs that have precisely the same frequency to an array of antennas that are independently adjustable. Imaging feeding 4 an; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00366.html (8,336 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "David H. Walker" <k0cop@onlymyemail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:04:11 -0000; 73,K0COP David H. Walker Aiken, SC k0cop@onlymyemail.com Virus scan by BitDefender You are right in many aspects the SDR-1000 does not equal the Orion, it surpasses it. I own 2 SDR-1000's and one Ori; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00374.html (10,042 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:13:32 -0500; Tom makes a good point about break in with SDR-1000. SDR folks found that turnaround time for various sound cards was different, and critical to the breakin problem. You can only use the sound cards; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00378.html (8,961 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:34:47 -0400; -- Original Message -- I believe Ten Tec *Has* acknowledged that they are working on the "bugs" in the software, and are working to eliminate them. I prefer for them to keep working on the problems a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00382.html (9,813 bytes)
39. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:35:49 -0700 (PDT); Bill, Why do you think only in terms of 4 symetrical 1/4 wave antennas spaced on a 1/4 wave square for a single band? Because that is what your $350 dollar phasor forces you to consider. Once you are; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00383.html (8,214 bytes)
40. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:44:26 -0700 (PDT); Bill I will answer in line, it is a good discussion thank you for the questions. <Lee, I wasn't going to mention this but since you did, I've got to ask some dumb <1. Why would you ever choose 4 sepa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00385.html (10,844 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]