Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SGC\'s\s+ADSP2\s+board\s+on\s+a\s+TT\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SGC\'s\s+ADSP2\s+board\s+on\s+a\s+TT\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "KQ6XY" <kq6xy@goldrush.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:26:44 -0700; Has anyone installed SGC's ADSP2 board in an Omni VI+? See http://www.sgcworld.com/news/ADSP2Introduction.html If so, please let me know. 73, de Larry, kq6xy _________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00135.html (6,593 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:06:00 -0700; The Omni VI+ already has DSP, and in my experience it works pretty well. Why would you want to add this board? What would it buy you? - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX Heathkit HW-9 WARC/HFT-9/HM-9 Elecraft; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00136.html (7,624 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "KQ6XY" <kq6xy@goldrush.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:52:36 -0700; Check out page 22 of the latest issue (Sept 2003) of CQ magazine, which reads: " With the ADSP2 board installed, the receiver in the Argonaut V has finally surpassed the well-respected Ten-Tec Omni V; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00137.html (8,401 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:55:27 -0700; Hey, there are lies, damn lies, statistics... and press releases. But where's the test data that SHOWS the Argonaut V/ADSP2 has better specs than the Omni VI+? This is just someone's ASSERTION. Re th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00138.html (9,712 bytes)
5. [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:15:30 -0400; KQ6XY wrote: Check out page 22 of the latest issue (Sept 2003) of CQ magazine, which reads: " With the ADSP2 board installed, the receiver in the Argonaut V has finally surpassed the well-respected T; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00139.html (11,477 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "KQ6XY" <kq6xy@goldrush.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:28:29 -0700; than Presumably has lot Hz against does That is what I would like to find out can't in I believe it would be best to connect the ADSP2 board before the AF according to what I have read. think Yes it; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00140.html (10,334 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] SGC's ADSP2 board on a TT Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: DennisKT5D@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 20:59:52 EDT; I have the high power ADSP2 unit connected to an OMNI 6+. Yes, there is a definite improvement in the removal of hash and static crashes, a remarkable improvement. It is better than the built in NR o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00141.html (7,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]