Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SSB\s+Xtals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+SSB\s+Xtals\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] SSB Xtals (score: 1): Author: w4ec@juno.com (DARYL L NOEL); Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 18:03:05 EST; Hello all, Does anyone know if the potential order of a 2.7 Khz SSB filter (or pair of them for each transceiver) is now a dead horse?? I know that this was in discussion for a while along with the C; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00230.html (6,744 bytes)
2. [TenTec] SSB Xtals (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 16:01:21 -0800; I have not heard this directly from Ten Tec, but the word is that their engineers feel that this would be problematic for the transceiver for some reason, and that the wider filter would cause probl; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00231.html (7,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]