Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Shootout\s+at\s+OK\s+Corral\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Shootout\s+at\s+OK\s+Corral\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:47:23 -0500; It's clear from the recent discussions on this reflector that we hams are now in the brave new world of software-driven transceivers and there's no turning back. In ten years, I suspect, there will b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00523.html (8,080 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:36:07 +0000; The Japanese "Big Three" all seem to be vigorously pursuing the VHF/UHF market with late offerings from all three brands. Of course, the actual source of those radios has been a matter of speculation; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00527.html (10,955 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:43:20 -0000; Is it possible that HF rigs are too heavy on the belt ? market with late offerings from all three brands. Of course, the actual source of those radios has been a matter of speculation, with assembly; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00531.html (12,020 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Shootout at OK Corral (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:16:00 -0500; John Rippey wrote: The bad news is that transceivers using these chips cannot be built on the cheap. The chips are expensive, and even more expensive are the software design teams that make them work; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00605.html (8,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]