Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Slightly\s+OT\:\s+SSB\s+vs\s+AM\s+$Warning\!\:\s+Heavy\s+Sarcasm$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Slightly\s+OT\:\s+SSB\s+vs\s+AM\s+$Warning\!\:\s+Heavy\s+Sarcasm$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (Warning!: Heavy Sarcasm) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Tue Apr 22 22:51:45 2003; Shhh, Carl, you used a bad word: fidelity. You see, almost nobody is even considering fidelity in any of these discussions. Only bandwidth. As hams, we're not suppposed to be concerned about fidelit; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00621.html (8,709 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (Warning!: Heavy Sarcasm) (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK); Date: Tue Apr 22 23:27:00 2003; On a related note - - - Concerning this new DRM mode and receivers such as the RX-320 - is this to say that if you do not have such a receiver and/or computer with suitable sound card that you will N; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00622.html (7,717 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (Warning!: Heavy Sarcasm) (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Wed Apr 23 09:31:10 2003; Bill, No the current DRM project is to develop and test the methodology. There is development (and there is a picture of a prototype) of standalone receivers (even portables) that will be able to rec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00628.html (9,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]