Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sloper\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sloper\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: KMerzel@aol.com; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:55:45 EST; Hello All: Alpha Delta makes a sloper for 160-30 Meters. They advise to use against a tower. Would I have any luck running a wire down vertically as I do not have a tower? Ken N2XY __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00042.html (6,304 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 23:00:36 +0100; Ken, you need to be more specific. If you don't have a tower, then you have to have some kind of a support. It might be a tree or a mini-pole on top of a house - something. Whatever it is, if it is n; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00043.html (8,126 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Dave" <frstbaptistchurch@wyoming.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 15:13:17 -0700; On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:55:45 EST KMerzel@aol.com wrote: Hello All: Alpha Delta makes a sloper for 160-30 Meters. They advise to use against a tower. Would I have any luck running a wire down verticall; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00044.html (7,830 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:21:19 -0500; If there has to be vertical wire, it would be much wiser NOT to ground it. RF power forced into soil produces no signal. So called "half-slopper" antenna is a dipole (as most antennas are) deformed s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00045.html (7,559 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 23:49:24 +0100; Sinsa, I do not agree with you. I believe it will work better if grounded. However, to be honest, I am not 100% sure and if it turns out you are right, then I shall learn something useful. As I see i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00046.html (8,480 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 19:41:21 -0500; Hi Rick, OK, let's see if you would agree with physics :-) It is a simple fact that pushing RF power into soil does not produce useful radiation, although some other goals may be achieved, like "perf; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00052.html (13,141 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 03:11:41 +0100; Sinsa "Hi-hard to respond" your answer was very long and covered many things. Sir - theory and practice.... First, in theory, how could I disagree? Second, Ken wants to run multiple bands (which you; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00056.html (18,547 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:18:22 -0000; Windom antenna would cover 10 - 160 m but it should be 78 m (260 ft) long and even YT1NT couldn.t provide you with a good balun! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU Disclaimer: I use DL Hari Windom but I had to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00064.html (7,627 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: KMerzel@aol.com; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 09:59:38 EST; Hello All: Thank you all for the feedback regarding the sloper. My lot size is approximately 50 x 230 with a few trees in back so my main antennas to date have been verticals. I felt like experimenti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00070.html (8,364 bytes)
10. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "H John Kohl" <ko4a@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 10:30:49 -0500; SKY WIRE LOOP 80 Meter I have used this loop on 160 if I feed it with ladder line. I use the 450 ohm ladder line. Ideally it should be 68' on each leg for 272' total length. During the PA QSO I had t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00072.html (9,639 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 10:54:07 -0500; You can run one dipole leg vertical, and other horizontal, or zig-zag, or in any other fashion. Resonant frequency will change slightly, but that's easy to correct. Look at "Low-Band DXing from a Sma; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00074.html (7,826 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Mike Sloan" <gu3whn@cwgsy.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 18:21:43 -0000; Just an idea that works very well at: http://www.cwgsy.net/private/gu3whn/station.html _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00080.html (7,843 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 15:45:41 -0500; Nice example of what I did recommend to Ken. Call it any name you like, I just see a good old trapped dipile, distorted to fit the space. Adding the second "radial" is also a good idea. Nice to see; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00086.html (7,956 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Mike Sloan" <gu3whn@cwgsy.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:11:54 -0000; Yes, agree about the name. The basic concepts are well known. Not an issue for me. Was going to put a flat top on it and pull it up to the vertical for even better low angle radiation but never got a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00134.html (9,239 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:13:38 -0600; The sloper tends to favor the direction of its lowest leg. However, an alternate antenna, is to bring off the half wave as a sloping leg, then at the center feed point, angle back toward the support,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00174.html (8,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]