Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Solid\s+State\s+amps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Solid\s+State\s+amps\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:13:54 -0600; Sorry, I should have couched the regulation is for USA Glad to have international Ten Tec owners and contributors to the list. 73 Stuart _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00293.html (9,079 bytes)
22. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:45:52 -0500; Dudley, We are legally entitled to build our own HF amplifiers... Build as many as you need for your own use. The only restriction is the number of HF amplifiers that we can build for OTHERS... 73, L; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00295.html (11,346 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:54:18 -0500; Actually John, the ARRL told the FCC many times before they were enacted that the amp ban was bad rule making... or to put it as bluntly as you did, stupid. But the FCC chose not to listen. They took; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00298.html (12,929 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 15:43:04 -1000; Over here in Europe we have similar rules regarding not being allowed to sell certain amps, but hams may buy anything anywhere in the world and run it as long as they ascertain it meet the rules & re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00302.html (10,022 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:16:08 -0500; Larry, Actually, I believe the FCC rules do limit the number you can build to one per year. They don't say anything about the disposisiton. §97.315 Certification of external RF power amplifiers.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00309.html (9,772 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:32:49 -0500; You can't build more than 1 of a type per year if it is for HF or 6 meters. You could build single band amplifiers of the same design except for different bands as an example. Or you could build mult; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00310.html (10,907 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Solid state amps (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:40:18 -0500; what sort of pulse width are you able to get? working on ionospheric sounder for the back yard :-) -bob Bill Fuqua wrote: Interesting item. By coincidence I am working on a power tube tester today. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00321.html (9,900 bytes)
28. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:00:02 -0500; Mark... By definition, FCC R&R §97.315 Certification of external RF power amplifiers allows me to build 1 unit of 1 model, but... I may make as many DIFFERENT MODELS as I want. Therefore, if I m; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00324.html (10,164 bytes)
29. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:00:06 -0500; Mark, I thought of another issue... There are a number of individuals advertising for 'basket case' Heath SB-220's and other HF amplifiers on QTH.COM, e-Bay, E-ham, and other web classified pages. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00325.html (9,680 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Ynkedragon@aol.com; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:31:52 EST; << The individuals may not be 'refurbing' these amplifiers by the thousands, but they certainly are doing it in small production quantities. Are they limited by FCC R&R..? I surely hope not, since th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00326.html (8,464 bytes)
31. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:42:12 -0800; Refurbing an existing amp is not manufacturing, it is repairing. The door is wide open for someone to buy old basket-case amps, rebuild 'em, and resell them to amateurs. I've seen a couple of repair; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00327.html (10,869 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Solid state amps (score: 1): Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 13:38:16 -0500; Sorry it is not a burst but a 5uS pulse at about 100 PPS. By using long pulses like this I can use a simple diode rectifier and single capacitor filter in the Plate current detector ckt. 73 Bill wa4l; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00328.html (10,552 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:02:02 -0600; The big problem with solid state amps right now is that Motorola is self destructing, and is selling off their semiconductor division. They already discontinued the line of RF transistors for power a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00330.html (9,548 bytes)
34. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:19:09 -0500; Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean that they are NOT out to get you... <grin> The FCC may make some bad decisions, but they are NOT unaware of these issues... GET A LIFE, KIDDO..! 73, Larry; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00333.html (9,108 bytes)
35. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:27:35 -0600; IF THE FCC HAD ANY CONCERN AT ALL.... they would go get the guy who has 15 different ebay listings for " amateur" 300 watt amps... with no bandpass filtering....for cheapo...; He also sells mobile an; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00340.html (8,518 bytes)
36. RE: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "edo" <edo@mitre.org>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:59:08 -0500; I have heard of a re-org at Motorola but I have no knowledge of parts being discontinued. Ed O. I will check out their internet site. The big problem with solid state amps right now is that Motorola; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00372.html (10,022 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:31:45 -0700; You might check to see if ON Semiconductor, a spin-off from Motorola Semiconductor, produces the RF devices. http://www.onsemi.com Jim N7US I have heard of a re-org at Motorola but I have no knowledg; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00373.html (10,617 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:27:02 +0000; I'm not sure how many hams want a no-tune amp--tuning a tube plate to low Z doesn't really bother me that much, in fact I prefer to do it myself, not trusting some logic circuit to tune and load for; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00495.html (8,206 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:16:48 -0700; TheSG-500, PW-1 and Quadra were reviewed in QST. The SGC has a 3rd Order IMD of -28 dB and 5th Order of -48. The PW-1 is -36 and -41 respectively. The Quadra as -32 and -44. None are anything to writ; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00499.html (10,048 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:28:03 -0500; I think the no-tune amps make a lot of sense for SO2R and other multi-radio and multi-band contesters. Outside of that application a no-tune amp is just "nice" but not really essential. Lots of peopl; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00501.html (9,189 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]