Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Source\s+for\s+Binaural\s+Receiver\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 12:37:18 -0500
From the 2005 Version Update of the Orion 565 Manual, in the "Buttons" setup and definition Section: (Note- This works with EITHER of the two receivers, only one is required, and they may be separate
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00023.html (10,482 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:47:12 -0800
A Rolls Royce would a significant upgrade to my Toyota Sequoia, but I don't need a Rolls Royce. Cost is not the issue, usefulness is. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00024.html (9,483 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:31:14 +0000
It's important to understand that not all binaural implementations are equal in effect. They vary drastically. The binaural/spatial stereo effect is very prominent in the direct conversion designs th
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00026.html (10,709 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Harald Rester <harryrester@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:39:40 +0100
DJ5IL decribes his version and circuit of a pseudo stereo reception called "codephaser" (pdf in english). There are also sound files available at his home page. Looks very interesting, although itīs
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00027.html (10,195 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: gerd Groos <df9ts.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 19:58:55 +0100
Hello, Had a QSO with DJ5IL last year. He stated using the codephaser daily. As he put it: CW sounds boring without. I have one such codephaser ( http://www.cq-cq.eu/DJ5IL_rt001.pdf ) for sale. 30 EU
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00028.html (10,179 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:37:30 -0700
Would a pair of carefully tuned and properly placed resonant speakers work? Spencer W1GAK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00031.html (8,464 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Doc <k0evzdoc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:46:10 -0700
Spencer, well frankly I don't know for sure, but don't believe so. In fact, wouldn't a stereo headset be better, also allowing the operator to move around a bit, while the audio into the headset woul
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00035.html (9,978 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ellington <steven4lq@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:49:45 -0500
You can get some effect by simply reversing the leads on one side of your headset. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00036.html (10,967 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Matheny K8RYU <mathenyr@marietta.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:08:31 -0500 (EST)
This concept goes back \at least to the 1970's when a fellow named Hlidreth (I think) wrote several articles for Ham Radio describing audio filtering systems. The idea always sounded great but I have
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00037.html (9,595 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:24:56 -0800
No. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00038.html (8,856 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:29:22 -0800
Not true. The signal processing described for what these folks are calling "binaural receive" is somewhat complex, far more than a polarity reversal of one channel. Since I own radios with this proce
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00039.html (9,735 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ellington <steven4lq@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:38:37 -0500
Dear Not True: I said SOME effect...Not SAME effect. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00040.html (9,841 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Steve Ellington <steven4lq@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:59:40 -0500
Dear "Not True": I said "SOME effect"....Not same effect. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00041.html (9,843 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:48:16 -0700
I said "SOME effect"....Not same effect. I will try to get 90 degree phase diff in a set of headphones +45 one side, -45 other side. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00042.html (9,052 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:08:48 -0600
I think what you will find is that there will be no aural spatial definition. Where we perceive sounds come from depends on a phase difference defined by time-of-arrival and frequency. The phase diff
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00043.html (10,049 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:07:14 -0800
Kim is almost right in that it is TIME that gives us the most powerful directional cues. Amplitude differences between ears is second. The low pass filter to one ear and high pass to the other does b
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00044.html (12,230 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Source for Binaural Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:51:09 -0700
H3D (head 3 dimension) NASA does that. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-01/msg00045.html (8,948 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu