Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+Argo\s+V\s+\-\s+how\s+are\s+they\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Speaking\s+of\s+Argo\s+V\s+\-\s+how\s+are\s+they\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:56:41 -0500; Bugs / Straight Keys / QRP - that all brings me to the Argonaut V. I've read on the Yahoo Argo V group that most are quite happy with the little "gem" but some bemoan the current consumption which ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00439.html (7,699 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:45:18 EST; Hi Keith, That's about right. No, the receiver isn't as good as an Orion or my FT-102, but after nearly a year of operation I can say that if you can't copy a station with the Argo V, you probably ca; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00455.html (7,968 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: Don Sachnoff <kx9q@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:27:44 -0600; Is there an advantage to getting the Argo V with TCXO? Can one really say they have noticed a significant difference with and without the TCXO? Don - kx9q ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00473.html (7,472 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:46:21 -0500; Don If you download the Argo V specs from TenTec, you will see that there is not that much to be gained. If you plan on doing RTTY and digi modes to any extent, it would be worth the extra cost. Ron; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00474.html (8,103 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: Ynkedragon@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:51:25 EST; << If you plan on doing RTTY and digi modes to any extent, it would be worth the extra cost. >> or MARS operation. k3yd _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00475.html (7,359 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:40:03 -0600; The Argo V is quite adequate for crowded Field Day bands and much better than some older rigs we have commonly used, like the Kenwoods and Icoms. Stuart K5KVH ________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00480.html (7,680 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]