Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TEN\-TEC\s+announces\s+new\s+amplifier\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Mike Stricker <info4mjs@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
I wonder who else is getting tired hearing about new products when Ten Tec still hasn't finished the simple things on their old products.  John Henry told me at the Orlando Hamcation that it was an e
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00073.html (7,058 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Emerson" <w4tje@wiredog.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:20:07 -0400
I don't feel this way. In fact every time I get a chance to get on the air with my O2 I feel blessed to be able to own the best radio I have had in 35 plus years on air. Sri ur monitor doesn't read p
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00074.html (8,947 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:35:02 -0500
Mike, TenTec does not make money on software updates. It is a matter of revenue. They probably have one person or two people at most who do software updates and probably only on a part time basis. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00075.html (9,349 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:45:27 +0000 (UTC)
I agree with Jack. I've been on this reflector for several years, and have deleted literally hundreds of complaints about software updates. During that time, I have been able to log thousands of cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00076.html (10,281 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Lloyd Westbrook <w4ao.dx@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:48:56 -0400
Amen - same here W4AO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00077.html (11,437 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:52:05 -0500
Well, I see the TenTec groupies have awoken! Dave, here is another one for you to delete. Jerry W5JH I agree with Jack. I've been on this reflector for several years, and have deleted literally hundr
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00078.html (10,901 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hansohn <chris.hansohn@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:29:22 -0400
Well this is a TenTec group. Just sayin'... Chris, K4RCH -- www.HansohnBrothers.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00080.html (8,207 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry, N9AW" <n9aw@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:19:29 -0500
So, if you had this big issue fixed tomorrow would you be able to work anything that you can't now? Would the receiver or transmitter somehow work better. How about that state of the art DSP...would
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00081.html (9,860 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Mike Stricker <info4mjs@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Jerry, I understand your point perfectly well.  John Henry told me that adjusting the alignment is very easy...just changing a variable in the FW.  If it is that easy then it should be done so the
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00082.html (9,279 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:49:35 -0500
Jerry, Think of this way, it might make him feel better about his $4000 radio! Part of that $4000 has to be service after the sale. And, if John Henry promised him the fix would be easy to do and has
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00083.html (11,254 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:20:48 -0500
Truthfully, I don't share the irritation that you describe. Sure! I would like to see a few more.better bells and whistles on the display. But, I've become accustomed to the various niggles and gnats
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00084.html (11,803 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:29:51 -0500
The fact is radio's are not test equipment. It is unreasonable to expect perfectly calibrated S meters and ultimate accuracy in the spectrum display. It's not a calibrated spectrum analyzer. You want
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00085.html (13,676 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:41:52 -0500
They only loose the sale if you go somewhere else and my guess is you ain't going nowhere because you have already had your Yaesu, Icom, Kenwood experience. If not you would have already dropped that
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00086.html (11,017 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:54:50 -0500
It could be a lot worse - how many rigs did Yaesu put out with the noise blanker never fully turned off, so they had overload images on all bands all the time? And this happened model after model aft
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00087.html (10,407 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Jose F Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 23:48:13 -0400
I have an Eagle and as others can buy an Orion II or any other radio costing much more, but why not fix the NR of this one on the Orion? Tempted to purchase another brand if this isn't taken care of.
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00088.html (10,163 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:52:57 +0200
HOW DO ANY OF YOU GUYS KNOW WHETHER J.H. HAS FIXED THAT PROBLEM OR NOT? If you haven't noticed, Ten-Tec, like every other company, does not release new firmware "one bug fix at a time." Perhaps J.H.
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00090.html (10,670 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:32:06 -0400
Fair question, Mike. I am ambivalent because I am extremely happy with my Omni VII, but I also sympathize with those who have radios that don't work exactly as they are supposed to. I don't expect an
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00091.html (11,794 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:07:44 -0400
It's kinda funny. While my TT Omni VII was in the shop (a self-inflicted wound, I toasted a receiver diode hot-swapping an active receiver antenna... doh!) - I purchased a Kenwood TS-590s, as a backu
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00092.html (12,167 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:14:28 +0200
James, now the big question: "does the radio like you?" ;-) Rick, DJ0IP It's kinda funny. While my TT Omni VII was in the shop (a self-inflicted wound, I toasted a receiver diode hot-swapping an acti
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00093.html (12,709 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Mike Stricker <info4mjs@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Rick, The reason why I suspect it hasn't been fixed yet is because it was not fixed in the latest release, which was well after I complained about it.  Prior to the last release, there was a probl
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00095.html (9,229 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu