Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TT\s+net\s+on\s+7\.288\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TT\s+net\s+on\s+7\.288\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TT net on 7.288 (score: 1): Author: mrhinkel@ix.netcom.com (Mark Hinkel); Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:30:09 -0500; Hi Roger, The average dipole really is a good antenna, and you have yours elavated quite a bit. I would not call it a "poor antenna system" at all... I only wish I could get mine up 30ft. I use the C; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00002.html (7,457 bytes)
2. [TenTec] TT net on 7.288 (score: 1): Author: rcook@hiwaay.net (roger); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:33:13 -0600; I have Monitored the TenTec net frequently since it has been on 7.288. I have never had any type of problems or even heard the swbc stations. I live in North Alabama and only have a dipole up at abou; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00006.html (8,072 bytes)
3. [TenTec] TT net on 7.288 (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:08:39 -0500; I bet you are too close to hear it. I bet you are in the skip zone of the station. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ live time. problems 7.290 UTC splatter; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00007.html (9,139 bytes)
4. [TenTec] TT net on 7.288 (score: 1): Author: Bill Fulling" <w4njf@email.midflorida.com (Bill Fulling); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:30:37 -0500; Hello Jerry, Wanted to check into the net last nite but a strong SWBC station on = 7.290 is wiping you out.This station (Havana?) starts its interval sig = at 2355 UTC and signs on at 0000 UTC.While; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00626.html (7,249 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]