Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TT\s+vs\.\s+Palstar\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TT\s+vs\.\s+Palstar\s+Antenna\s+Tuner\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:48:10 -0800; Thanks to all of you who responded with your comments on the TT 238B and the Palstar 1500CV high power tuners. I appreciate the value of being part of this reflector group. Jeff - KX2P ______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00535.html (6,660 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Eugene Klingler" <n8zx@tds.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:25:56 -0500; Jeff.....investigate the Nye Viking tuner with all the meters & baluns built in.....it is a truly superior tuner....handles 3kw....it costs more, but it is built like a tank & you will never regret b; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00536.html (7,785 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:08:25 -0800; You know, the NYE tuner is truly "built like a tank" but I had one and gave it up pretty quickly because the tuning range was more limited on my particular antennas than for my Johnson matchbox and m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00540.html (8,210 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1): Author: n4in@insightbb.com; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:13:01 +0000; Jeff, I have had a 238 and now have the Palstar AT4K and love it. Tunes everything effortlessly at 1200-1300W out, station is TT Omni VI+ with Centurion that does about 1200+ on all bands. I use mine; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00558.html (8,722 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]