Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TVI\s+95\%\s+Shield\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TVI\s+95\%\s+Shield\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 02:02:41 +0000; In my "real world" TVI is the norm, not the exception. I have lived and operated in the usa (at all power levels) at seven locations in six states and had some degree of TVI in all those places. In T; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00307.html (11,406 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: "Ken Scheper" <kenshep@one.net>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 22:31:16 -0400; Well guys....let's all get ready for the 2009 digital bedlam !!! I've had 3 of my neighbors TODAY say that they have purchased the new digital boxes, and the pictures are GREAT! They don't need cable; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00330.html (14,186 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:13 -0700; Almost all of the digital stations are on UHF, so the problems won't be quite as bad, especially on 6 meters. Just choke all the wires going in or out of the TV set and AV receiver if there is one, a; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00331.html (16,819 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:26:09 -0400; Ken Scheper writes... Now that you've spilled the beans and they are challenging you on it, tell them that your hobby is legally sanctioned and licensed, and it would be no different if they lived ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00333.html (10,775 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:48:29 -0700; Actually, on the robustness of digital TV. Reports in the trade press I receive tell of digital dropping out completely, and not having a graceful fall off in signal quality. Also, it is not able to; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00334.html (9,449 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 23:23:48 -0400; Stuart Rohre writes... Oh, yes, that is true. I am able to receive two of four local stations reliably. But even they occasionally break up. You'll see imaging artifacts that will multiply, and the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00338.html (10,955 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 20:38:16 -0700; Rick brings up an interesting point. It is possible that TVI for hams on HDTV will blank the screen, so the TV viewer will not have a clue what happened, unless they live in the ham's house! Maybe DT; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00340.html (9,771 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]